Wheel of Acoustics<\/em><\/p>\n Small room critical listening environments, such as recording control rooms and audio playback rooms incorporate most of the disciplines listed in the wheel. We have come a long way very recently in the fields of acoustics (fig.\u00a02). Especially in just the last 60\u00a0years. It wasn\u2019t until 1967 that there was enough computer power to begin to investigate the relationships of time, energy and frequency. And then it wasn\u2019t until 1980 when Richard Heyser<\/strong> introduced a dedicated Time Delay Spectrometry<\/em> analyzer that companies could afford, and then develop and share their findings. And only in the last 3-4\u00a0decades (especially the last few years) has neurology and physiology been able to study the living brain and correlate it with perception.<\/p>\n Limited & Basic Acoustical Development Time Line<\/p>\n During this time, standards for materials testing labs have been established such as ASTM<\/em>, ANSI<\/em>, and ISO<\/em>. With behavioral data of how sound propagates in small rooms, and characterizations of materials and assemblies regarding sound energy absorption, transmission and reflection, vibrational resonance and transmissibility, etc., we can apply computer model solutions for acoustic problems, and then confirm, or further investigate them onsite with portable field test equipment. These relatively new developments have really opened the knowledge base. We can characterize and quantize sound in areas that did not exist before I was born. And it will continue to grow as we continue to learn and technology improves further still.<\/p>\n Richard\u00a0C. Heyser<\/strong> said \u201cSound is what happens when air is pushed<\/em>\u201d. Acoustics is the behavior of sound. In our instance, it is how it interacts with the room. Specifically in our instance, it is about the reproduction of music. Even more specifically, it is about how well the equipment is reproducing the music in the room, and being perceived. Your playback equipment and your playback environment are a system. They work together to reproduce the sound waves that reach your ears. However, in a playback environment, we only want to reproduce the performance environment, not add ours to the mix. Ours should not interfere. In a performance venue, reflections support the music, but not so in playback venues. For accurate, consistent reproduction, the chaotic propagation of sound in space must be controlled.<\/p>\n All the materials of the room\u2019s shell and its contents reflect, resonate, absorb, and transmit sound energy. None of these vibrations are part of the original recording, and they are unwanted. These vibrations interfere with the original, direct sound from the loudspeakers in the time, energy and frequency domains. Distortions in these domains affect our perception of timbre, dynamics, spatiality, and low-level resolution, etc. Our perception is based on our human physiology, and our individual psychology.<\/p>\n In addition to controlling the original sound propagation within the space, extraneous noise generators such as appliances, HVAC, outside traffic, power noise, etc. are also unwanted vibrations.<\/p>\n In critical listening environments for playback\u00a0\/ reproduction of music, the goal is for the room to not interfere with the direct airborne sound waves from the loudspeakers (source) to the listener\u2019s ears (receiver). In enclosed spaces, this is impossible to control 100\u00a0%. There will always be compromises based on constraints from the space\u2019s dimensions, construction materials and methods, interior furnishings, etc. that will cause constructive and destructive interference, and\/or extraneous noise. There is also the physical set-up of the playback equipment and how it specifically interacts with the environment to consider.<\/p>\n Room acoustics can interfere with all aspects of sound quality, including articulation, tonal balance, imaging, low-level detail, micro and macro dynamics, etc. There are goals of room acoustic characteristics that are unofficially established, which can be used as a reference base for comparison. Included among these attributes for quality sound in a critical playback environment are the following:<\/p>\n The goal is for a neutral environment so that the equipment can perform to the best of its capabilities, and the experience is of the highest level.<\/p>\n The specifications above can be computer modeled, but are best actually measured onsite. Levels below the bar may be audible, which can limit and distort the original intent and experience. Note that typical listening rooms have poor room mode distribution, noise floors of 33-38\u00a0dB SPL A-weighted, chaotic reverberation times, audible early reflections, and all kinds of structural resonances, buzzes and rattles.<\/p>\n There are certainly some subjective areas in audio playback to discuss. However, the fundamentals listed should apply regardless of personal \u2018opinions\u2019 or \u2018preferences\u2019. Such sonic attributes should not be the result of the room acoustics, but solely of the associated equipment and\u00a0\/ or its set-up. Such preferences may include tonal balance, soundstage and image perspective, etc. Though the room can affect these attributes, the goal is that it does not. With a controlled room, these subjective characteristics can be more easily dialed-in. There is no right or wrong regarding an individual\u2019s taste in sound quality for enjoyment, however, I do believe that it takes a quality listener years of experience to understand the difference between more accurate, versus simply different.<\/p>\n This is also where some art can be applied. For example: a client may want more pronounced bass response\u00a0– there are a number of ways to achieve this passively; speaker\u00a0\/ listener locations, room dimensions, construction materials and methods, interior acoustic treatments, etc. Maybe the client wants a closer, more intimate soundstage perspective\u00a0– this can be accomplished with speaker separation and toe-in adjustments, as well as acoustic treatments.<\/p>\n Once the physical characteristics of the room are known, you can begin to assemble the playback environment to handle sound propagation in an organized, controlled manner.<\/p>\n This requires knowledge of how the speaker type disperses sound into the room, the speaker bandwidth, the room volume, its construction and furnishings (material or product noise reduction coefficients from acoustic lab tests), external noise generators (appliances, fans, etc.). The information could be entered into a computer and modeled, or for best results, it is measured onsite. Then solutions are entered into a computer model and adjusted until optimal results are found. This can be done for numbers\u00a01-4 of the sound quality attributes listed above, and others. As a consultant, I would say that most of my time is spent on computer modeling for different areas of the project. Each requires different disciplines. For example; applying interior acoustic surface treatments, you have to know what frequencies you\u2019re addressing, their associated wavelengths, where they are most effective in the room, whether to apply particle pressure or particle velocity for the solution, what type of treatment, how much of it, and where. There is a lot of physics involved. You can\u2019t just guess. You are looking for the perfect balance so that the room sounds natural and neutral. When you apply this correctly, you can apply it to any room and achieve consistent results predictably and repeatably.<\/p>\n There is a hierarchy to it as well, because pretty much everything affects everything else. In addition, you have to make the course adjustments before you can fine-tune. Let\u2019s look at the first two from the list above for examples. The low frequencies are usually the most difficult to control. This is because they have the most energy, the longest wave lengths, and are very influential perceptually. So, I typically start looking at the room modes<\/p>\n Five Passive Ways to Avoid Room Mode Problems:<\/strong><\/p>\n Often noise control is the biggest issue. You have to have noise under control before you can address sound quality. Remember that noise is a two-way street; if outside noise can get in and be a distraction, inside noise can get out and and be a distraction to others. Sometimes the noise is generated within the listening space itself, like HVAC, projector fan noise, electrical noise, etc.<\/p>\n Noise can be caused by airborne, or structureborne vibrations. Humans have known tolerances for noise. Once the noise spectrum and levels are established, along with the goal, you can apply solutions to; a) the noise source, b) the transmission path, and\u00a0\/ or c) the listener.<\/p>\n Basic Noise Solution Strategy<\/strong><\/p>\n As you can see, acoustics requires a systematic and scientific approach. Without it, you will likely be chasing your tail forever, never achieving your goals or optimal results. These goals allow you to realize the full potential of your equipment and investment, and offer the greatest experience. When these goals are not realized, there are limits to the experience. The original sounds are altered, smeared, skewed, and even added to from the structure, other noise generators, which mask low-level details, micro-dynamics, and limit the dynamic range. When the science of acoustics is applied, your equipment is able to perform at its best. As a matter of fact, your equipment\u2019s performance (and your enjoyment from it) is dictated by your acoustic environment.<\/p>\n Positioning your loudspeakers without addressing the acoustics of the environment (noise, room modes, first order reflections, reverberation times, isolation, etc.) leaves most of what audiophiles are trying to achieve sonically on the table, and most audiophiles don\u2019t even think about it or know about it.<\/p>\n![\"Roue](\"https:\/\/www.tedpublications.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Fig.-1-Wheel-of-Acoustics.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n